To Compare the Effectivness of Balance and Proprioception with Conventional Exercise in Non Specific Neck Pain
Rajalaxmi.V1, Sushmitha Anandhan2, K.Kirupa3, K. Kamatchi4,
Radhakrishnan Unnikrishnan5, Shady Abdullah Alshewaier6
1Professor, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Dr. M.G.R. Educational and Research Institute University, Velappanchavadi, Chennai - 600 077, Tamil Nadu, India.
3,4Assistant Professor, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Dr. M.G.R. Educational and Research Institute University, Velappanchavadi, Chennai - 600 077, Tamil Nadu, India.
2Physiotherapist, Aayushman Physiotherapy clinic, Vashi Navi, Mumbai, Maharastra, India.
5Lecturer, Department of Physical therapy and Health Rehabilitation, College of Applied medical Sciences, Majmaah university, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
6Dean of Library affairs, Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Therapy,
Majmaah university, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: rajalaxmi.physio@drmrgdu.ac.in
ABSTRACT:
Objective: The objective of the study was to determine the efficacy of proprioception and balance exercise along with conventional exercise in patients with neck pain. Methodology: This was an experimental study design 60 samples were selected based on the inclusion criteria, Group A received balance and Proprioception exercise and Group B conventional exercise. Pre and posttest measurement were taken and compared by using outcome measures of VAS, Four-Square Step Test and Modified Clinical Tests of Sensory Interaction in Balance. Results: On comparing the mean value of Group A and Group B, shows significant difference between group A and group B. Group A Balance and proprioception exercise seems to be more effective than Group B conventional exercises.
KEYWORDS: Chronic neck pain, Balance, Proprioception, Four Square Step Test, Modified Clinical Tests of Sensory Interaction.
INTRODUCTION:
Neck pain occurs in the world and resulting in substantial disability, economic cost and has large impact on lives. Pain in neck sometimes radiates in the nerve course of arm due to entrapments, varying intensity and may feel achy electric shock from neck to arm1. With the lack of trauma in neck, there arises the possibility of the proprioceptive dysfunction in neck pain stems from spinal or supra spinal causes2. Therefore, mechanical neck pain refers to neck pain caused by placing abnormal stress and strain on muscles and mostly results from poor posture3.
In India, since 1990 neck pain has increased by 19.1% by an average of 0.8% a year. Neck pain prevalence is higher in females than in males (41.7 vs 34.4%)5. For one year prevalence, Scandinavian countries reported more neck pain than rest of Europe and Asia6. Prevalence of neck pain was 20.3% amongst women who were widowers or separated7.
Balance is considered as an essential component of almost every motor performance task. Its function is regulated by central nervous system based on information from vestibular system8. Although Proprioception is generally considered to be a result of peripheral signals, the last decade of research has elucidated the critical role of central factors, such as integrity of proprioceptive maps and the important role of vestibular and visual inputs in body-related perception. Balance and Proprioception has found to be decreased in the patients with chronic mechanical neck pain9. Many mechanisms have been suggested to balance disturbances, but none has emerged as most prominent. The theories involve local factors, sensory and motor, and global factors, for example, central modulation10.
Modified Sensory Interaction test measured on force platform has good to excellent test-retest reliability and validity in a group of young and elderly women and is a means to quantify postural control under various sensory conditions Vestibular Disorders, Brain injury, Cerebral Palsy, Cerebrovascular accidents11.
materials and methods:
This experimental study design was conducted in the Physiotherapy department of ACS Medical College and hospital. 60 samples were selected from 90 volunteers based on the inclusion criteria. 90 Samples were divided into two groups Group A and Group B. GROUP A received Exercise for Balance and Proprioception: GROUP B received isometric neck exercises with hot pack Isometric exercises also called neck strengthening exercise. It includes forward, backward, sideward isometric strengthening.
DATA ANALYSIS:
The collected data were tabulated and analysed using both descriptive and inferential statistics. All the parameters were assessed using statistical package for social science (SPSS) version 24. Paired t-test was adopted to find the statistical difference within the groups independent t-test (Student t-Test) was adopted to find the statistical difference between the groups.
Table – 1 Comparison of Vas, Ctsib-M And Fst Within Group- A Between Pre and Post Test Values
|
#GROUP - A |
Pre-Test |
Post Test |
t - TEST |
Significance |
||
|
Mean |
S. D |
Mean |
S. D |
|
||
|
VAS |
6.18 |
1.12 |
2.60 |
.733 |
22.12 |
.000* |
|
Modified Clinical Test Of Sensory Interaction In Balance |
104.00 |
4.25 |
116.46 |
2.19 |
-18.86 |
.000*** |
|
Four Square Test |
16.80 |
1.61 |
10.53 |
1.59 |
27.46 |
.000*** |
Table-2 Comparison Of Ctsib-M And Fst Within Group- A Between Pre and Post Test Values
|
#GROUP - B |
Pre-Test |
Post Test |
t - Test |
Significance |
||
|
Mean |
S. D |
Mean |
S. D |
|
||
|
VAS |
6.15 |
.189 |
3.26 |
.453 |
19.00 |
.000*** |
|
Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction In Balance |
104.86 |
5.04 |
109.46 |
4.51 |
12.68 |
.000*** |
|
Four Square Test |
16.60 |
2.50 |
13.80 |
2.17 |
7.35 |
.000*** |
RESULTS:
On comparing the Mean values of Group A and Group B on Visual Analogue Scale Score, it shows significant decreasein the post test Mean values but (Group A -Balance and Proprioception Exercise) shows (1.60) which has the Lower Mean value is more effective than (Group B - Isometric Exercise With Hot Packs) (3.06) atP ≤ 0.001.
On comparing the Mean values of Group A and Group B on Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction in Balance, it shows significant Increase in the post test Mean values but (Group A -Balance and Proprioception Exercise) shows (116.46) which has the higher Mean value is more effective than (Group B - Isometric Exercise With Hot Packs) (109.46) at P ≤ 0.001.
On comparing the Mean values of Group A and Group B on Four Square Test, it shows significant decrease in the post test Mean values but (Group A -Balance and Proprioception Exercise) shows (10.53) which has the Lower Mean value is more effective than (Group B - Isometric Exercise With Hot Packs) (13.80) at P ≤ 0.001.
On comparing Pre-test and Post-test within Group A and Group B on VAS, Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction in Balance and Four Square Test shows highly significant difference in Mean values at P ≤ 0.001.
DISCUSSION:
The primary aim of the experimental study was to explore a clinical assessment of balance and proprioception in chronic neck pain patients. In combination with lack of trauma in neck pain, raise the possibility that the proprioceptive dysfunction in neck pain stems from spinal or supraspinal causes12. It was even found that cervical muscle fatigue produced significant disturbances on balance13. For instance, impaired balance during quiet standing has been reported in patients with chronic neck pain of different aetiologies14.
The other study concluded that Yoga is compared to Pilates and Tai chi and Control Group exercise for chronic mechanical neck pain. Yoga is effective in reducing pain, disability, quality of life and fear of movements in subjects with mechanical neck pain15. Both the groups (schroth method and yoga) shows improvement in the postural alignment (forward head shift, shoulder protraction) and pulmonary function16. Motor control exercises produced statistically significant changes in all the variables of the neck region in the post-intervention measurement than the endurance and conventional training group17. The study concluded that there is a positive correlation between the neck column length (anterior and posterior) and the head circumference with the neck pain18. Groups A neck stabilization and postural correction showed better significance than group B stretch and strengthening exercise in reducing pain and disability and improving posture and breathing patterns19. The study concluded that Modified Trunk Dissociation Retrainer (MTDR) is effective in improving balance and gait velocity in children with developmental delay20. Traditional Push Up and Wall Push Up were compared TPU was a significant when upper quarter Y-balance exercise showed significant difference21. Core stabilized and combined exercise on stable and unstable surfaces could improve dynamic mediolateral balance control22. The core stabilization and combined exercise performed on top the stable surface and unstable surface could improve the dynamic balance of the mediolateral direction23. Study concluded that the Balance exercise circuit (BEC) exercises in older adults improved gait parameters and functional performance24. Functional balance Traning Program is more beneficial in improving postural control and thereby could have the potential to reduce risk of injury when compared to Isolated Ankle Strengthening Exercise among the novice runners25. The study concluded that Proprioception training with interferential therapy (Group-A) is more effective than (Group-B) in decreasing pain and improving activity of daily living26. However, the balance training Group was considered to be more effective than the conventional exercises program.27
CONCLUSION:
The present study demonstrates that there is positive significant improvements in balance and proprioception group among neck pain of old age group. Hence, balance and proprioception is an important determinant factor in neck pain in old age group. This study is to create awareness among neck pain population that Balance and Proprioception is reduced due to neck pain in old age and hence Balance and Proprioceptive exercises should be added in regular routine exercise schedule. Through this study, we conclude that there seems to be evidence that balance and proprioception exercise are more beneficial in general exercise program in reducing neck pain and seems to be advantageous.
REFERENCES:
1. Wang H.Naghavi ,M., Allen, C., Barber , RM., Bhutta, Z.A., Carter , A., Casey, D.C., Charlson, F.J., Chen, A.Z., Coates , M.M and Coggeshell , M., 2016. GBD 2015 Mortality and causes of death collaborators. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all – cause mortality, and cause-mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of disease study 2015 (http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(16)31012-1/fulltext)
2. Tasha R. Stanton, Hayley B. Leake, K. Jane Chalmers, G. Lorimer Moseley., 2017. Evidence of Impaired Proprioception in Chronic , Idiopathic Neck Pain: systematic review and Meta-analysis. PhysTher. 2016 Jun: 96(6):876-87.
3. Childs MJ, Fritz JM, Piva SR, Whitman JM. Proposal of a classification system for patients with neck pain. (http://www.jospt.org/doi/pdf /10.2519/jospt .2004.34.11.686) Journal of Orthopaedics and Sports Physical Therapy. 2004 Nov;34(11):686-700.
4. Nora Corbett (/User:Nora_Corbett) and Jennifer Breithaupt (/User:Jennifer_Breithaupt) from Temple University’s Evidence Based Practice Project (/Temple_University_Evidence-Based_practice_Project) 2018.
5. Joshi VL, Chopra A. Is there an urban-rural divide? Population surveys of rheumatic musculoskeletal disorders in the Pune region of India using the COPCORD Bhigwan model. J Rheumatol 2009;36:614-22.
6. Fejer R, Kyvik KO, Hartvigsen J. The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literature .Eur Spine J 2006;15(6):834-48
7. Genebra CVDS, Maciel NM, Bento TPF, Simeao SFAP, Vitta A. Prevalence and factors associated with neck pain: a population-based study. Braz J PhysTher. 2017 Jul-Aug;21(4):274-280.
8. McLeod, B., and Hansen , E. (1989) Effects of the eyerobics visual skills training program on static balance performance of male and female subjects. Perceptual and Motor skills 1989 Dec:69(3)1123-6.
9. Proske U, Gandevia SC. The proprioceptive senses: their roles in signaling body shape. Body position and movement, and muscle force. Physical Rev. 2012;92;1651-1697.
10. Rania Reffat Ali Ahmed, Awatef Mohammed Labib, Mohammed Hussein Elgendy. Correlation between Neck Proprioception Deficit and Balance in chronic mechanical neck pain. Cairo university , 2005.
11. Shirley Ryan . Modified Clinical test of Sensory Interaction in Balance .2013
12. Nachemson A, Epidemiology of neck and back pain – Best practice and research, 2008, 22(3);471-482.
13. Uthaikhup S, Jull G, Sung Karat S, Treleavan J. The influence of neck pain on sensorimotor function in the elderly. 2012. Arch GerontorGeriatr 2012 Nov-Dec:55(3):667-72. Epub 2012 Feb 19.
14. Sremakaew M, Jull G, Treleavan J, Barbero M, Falla D, Uthaikhup S. Effects of local Treatment with & without sensorimotor & balance exercise in individuals with neck pain protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculo Skeletal disorder 2018 Feb 13; 19(1):48.
15. Rajalaxmi V, Jasim A, Sudhakar S and Mohan Kumar G, To Analyse the Effectiveness of Yoga, Pilates and Tai Chi Exercise for Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain -A Randomized Controlled Trial , Biomedicine, 2018, 38 (1), 147-51
16. V. Rajalaxmi, Jibi Paul, M. Nithya, S. Chandra Lekha, B. Likitha. Effectiveness of Three Dimensional Approach of Schroth Method and Yoga on Pulmonary Function Test and Posture in Upper Crossed Syndrome With Neck Pain-A double blinded study. Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2018;11(5):1835-39.
17. Rajalaxmi.V., Jibi Paul, M. Manoj Abraham et al. Efficacy of Motor Control and Endurance Exercises in Neck Pain: A Pilot Study. Indian J Forensic Med Pathol. 2019;12(1):19-24.
18. Rajalaxmi. V, Jibi Paul, M. Manoj Abraham, M. Sasirekha, D. Naveen Raj (2020). “Anthropometric Measures of Head and Neck in Relation with Chronic Neck Pain on Biomechanical Variables and Neck Muscle Endurance- A Correlational Study”, International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Phytopharmacological Research, 10(1), pp.29-38.
19. Rajalaxmi. V, V. K. Madhu Ranjani, Jibi Paul, S. S. Subramanian, Bernard Ebenezer Cyrus, V. Pavithralochani, Efficacy of Neck Stabilization and Postural Correction Exercise on Pain, Posture, Disability, Respiratory Dysfuntions and Mental Status in Desk Job Workers – A Randomised Controlled Double Blinded Study, Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 12(5): May 2019
20. Meera R., Chakravarthi V., Arunachalam R., Sujatha B., M. Manoj Abraham. Effectiveness of Modified Trunk Dissociation Retrainer in Improving Gait and Balance in Developmental Delay. Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2018; 11(11): 4870-4874.
21. Ji-Hye Park, Seul-Gi Jung, Dong-Yeop Lee, Ji-Heon Hong, Jin-Seop Kim, Jae-Ho Yu. Activation of selected Shoulder Muscle according to Posture during upper quarter Y Balance Exercise. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2017; 10(7): 2279-2284
22. Seung in Oh, Byeongseon Moon, Je ju Ryu, So hee Kim, Kyung tae Yoo. Effects of Core Stabilization and Combined Exercises on Stable and Unstable Surfaces on Balance and Body Alignment in Young, Healthy Women. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2017; 10(9): 3098-3102.
23. Kyung taeyoo. The effect of Core-combined Exercise on Dynamic Balance Based on the instability of the surface. Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2017; 10(11): 3903-3906
24. Gitasri Chakraborty, A. Kumaresan, Kiruthika. S Manoj Abraham. Effectiveness of Balance Exercise Circuit (BEC) on Improving Gait Parameters and Functional Performance in Older Adults. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2018; 11(1): 165-169
25. Selvaraj Sudhakar, Veena Kirthika. S, Padmanabhan. K, C.V. Senthil Nathan, S. Ramachandran, V. Rajalaxmi, S. Sowmiya, P. Senthil Selvam. Which is efficient in improving postural control among the novice runners? Isolated ankle strengthening or functional balance training programme: A randomized controlled trial. Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2018; 11(4): 1461-1466
26. Kamalakannan. M, Karthik. Efficacy of Proprioception Training for Tibiofemoral Arthritis in relation with Pain and Functional Disability. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2019; 12(3): 995-998
27. G. Vaishnavi, S. Chandralekha, G. Tharani, K. Kamatchi, K. Kirupa, R. Kamali, R. Rajasri, Rajavel. R. To Compare the Effectiveness of Balance Training and Conventional Exercises for Elderly Individuals. Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2021; 14(3):1274-1278.
Received on 12.05.2021 Modified on 18.11.2021
Accepted on 23.02.2022 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2022; 15(11):5192-5195.
DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00874